Open ID
...if you dare...
@dhague : I agree.
dickhirsch: 2008/09/16
Groups
Ume
UME integration may have to wait for next year though - right now we are compatible with all Java Servlet engines, and I think this is best for the open source stuff. There is some security/users/roles discussion on the Lift group right now, so it would be good if Lift supported a "plug & play" user/group/role model. UME would then just plug in.
dhague: 2008/09/16 conversation
@dhague : this is also a point in this blog - http://www.headshift.com/blog/2008/09/its-like-twitter-but-for.php . If we have UME integration, we have a lot of functionality out-of-the-box that is critical for enterprise sucess (for example integration with corporate LDAPs)
dickhirsch: 2008/09/16 conversation
@yojibee : Of course,
dickhirsch: 2008/09/10
Openid
Give Dick a spreadsheet to enter requirements, and off he goes! :)
yojibee: 2008/09/10
@dickhirsch : It is on the list for Berlin http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pX53kJHdLSLvQq25EOcViVg&hl=en
@dhague : excellent news. We should think about adding UME support (including OpenID) at some point soon.